Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Colorado Coal & Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Superior Court of the City of Denver. Petition for rehearing. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. This statement is, in brief, as follows: Ferdinand Jensen and William M. Bliss were engaged as partners in mercantile business at Denver, Colorado, and Deadwood, Dakota. The firm name, at the former place, was Jensen, Bliss & Co.; at the latter, it was Jensen & Bliss.

Read the full summary

Error to Superior Court of the City of Denver. Petition for rehearing. The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts. This statement is, in brief, as follows: Ferdinand Jensen and William M. Bliss were engaged as partners in mercantile business at Denver, Colorado, and Deadwood, Dakota. The firm name, at the former place, was Jensen, Bliss & Co.; at the latter, it was Jensen & Bliss. At the hour of J o’clock P. M., October 1, 1884, Jensen, Bliss & Co. made an assignment of certain claims, demands, notes and accounts, aggregating in value about $13,500, to one Metcalf, for the purpose…

1Opinion of the CourtHelm, J.

We are now satisfied that upon one of the material questions considered in the opinion of the court, written by myself, and filed in this cause, an erroneous conclusion was reached. That opinion is accordingly withdrawn. The views therein expressed which are still adhered to, as well as those resulting from our further investigation upon this rehearing, are embodied in the following opinion, which will be substituted therefor.

1. Since the persons constituting both the firms mentioned in the agreed statement were the same, and they were engaged in .carrying on the same business in both places,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. United States v. Hooe Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  4. Van Patten v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Hall v. DenisonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1845

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Fenton v. Edwards & JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Damaskus v. McCarty-Johnson Heating & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  4. Segnitz v. Garden City Banking & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hamilton v. IsaacsNebraska Supreme Court · 1892

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API