Legal Opinion

Lampson v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 15, 1865PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Clayton District Court. The plaintiffs commenced their suit by attachment against Lee & Kinnard, alleging, as the ground for attachment, that the defendants had disposed of their property in part with intent to defraud their creditors. The writ of attachment was served by summoning the defendant, Thomas Arnold, as garnishee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Clayton District Court. The plaintiffs commenced their suit by attachment against Lee & Kinnard, alleging, as the ground for attachment, that the defendants had disposed of their property in part with intent to defraud their creditors. The writ of attachment was served by summoning the defendant, Thomas Arnold, as garnishee. At the appearance term, the plaintiffs obtained judgment against Lee & Kinnard for the whole amount claimed, it being $421.85. At the same term, the defendant, as garnishee, filed his answer, negativing each of the statutory interrogatories; but in further…

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

The substantial facts proven on the trial of this case were, that on the 5th day of January, 1862, one of the.firm of Lee & Kinnard, who were bankers, went to Mr. Noble, as their attorney, and informed him that they were unable to continue business much longer unless something very favorable should occur within a very few days, '

' *482and desired his advice as to the best course to pursue. Mr. Noble expressed his preference for a general assignment, but before he could determine definitely, he must know more of their condition, which he had not time then, nor for two or three days, by reason of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buell v. Buckingham & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Wakeman v. GroverNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
  3. Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  4. Fromme v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  5. Day v. GriffithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  2. Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. In re Julius Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  5. Sargent v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API