Legal Opinion

Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NY

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1828PublishedCited by 209 opinions

. THIS was an action of trespass brought in the Circuit Court for the district of Pennsylvania, by the Atlantic Insurance Company of N.ew-Ybrk, against,John. Conard,the Marshal of the • district of. Pennsylvania, for taking and carrying away certain teas, imported from Canton into the port of Philadelphia, on board the ships Addison and Superior.

Read the full summary

. THIS was an action of trespass brought in the Circuit Court for the district of Pennsylvania, by the Atlantic Insurance Company of N.ew-Ybrk, against,John. Conard,the Marshal of the • district of. Pennsylvania, for taking and carrying away certain teas, imported from Canton into the port of Philadelphia, on board the ships Addison and Superior. Pleas the-general issue, and a special justification under a fi. fa.,against the goods.as the property of Edward Thomson, The suit was instituted, ánd tried under, an, agreement, which is recited in Jhe following bond.— Know all men by these…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Story

delivered the opinion of the Court.—

This is an action of trespass, de bonis asportatis, brought iu the Circuit Court, for the district of Pennsylvania, by the Atlantic Insurance Company, to recover against the< defendant John Conárd, the Marshál .of that district, the value of certain teas, shipped on board' -the ships Addison and Superior, and levied upon by him, upon an execution, in favour of the United States, against one Edward Thomsoñ, as the property of the latter. The real question in the cause is, whether the Insurance Company or the United States, are entitled to the teas or their…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  2. United States v. Hooe Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Thelusson v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. Prince v. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1814

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Massachusetts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. Waddill, Holland & Flinn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API