Fenton v. Edwards & Johnson
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
—This case was submitted in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of plaintiff, and this appeal is by the intervenor from the judgment, and comes here upon the judgment-roll. The agreed statement of facts, which may here be treated as the findings, shows, in substance, as follows: At all times mentioned in the said stipulation the Northrup, Braslan, Goodwin Company was a corporation, organized under the laws of Minnesota, doing business in Minneapolis and in ■ Chicago, Illinois. On May 38, 1896, the said corporation made a general…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guillander v. . HowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Milne v. MoretonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1814
- Campbell v. Colorado Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1885
- Butler v. WendellMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- In re Paige & Sexsmith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Waite v. WaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Mercantile Acceptance Co. v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Kracht v. Perrin, Gartland & DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- John Costello, as Trustee of the Estate of William Jason Evans, Bankrupt v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.