United States v. Hooe Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to tbe Circuit Court of the district of Columbia. (Reported below, 1 Cr. C. C. 116.)
1Opinion of the Court
Marshall, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court.
The first point made in this case, by the attorney for the United States, is, that the deed of the 16th of January 1799, is fraudulent as to creditors generally. It is not alleged, that the consideration was feigned, or that there was any secret trust between the parties. The transaction is admitted to have been, in truth, what it purports to be ; but it is contended, that the deed, on its face, is fraudulent as to creditors.
The deed is made to save Hooe harmless on account of his having become the security of Fitzgerald to the United…
2Cited by148 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Conard v. Atlantic Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.