Legal Opinion

Van Patten v. Burr

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 8, 1879PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Scott Circuit Cotirb. Action in chancery to set aside a general assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain chattel mortgages executed by defendant Joshua Burr, to the end that the property covered thereby may be made subject to a claim held by plaintiffs against Burr, upon which an action by attachment has been commenced. A demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Beok, Ch. J.

— I. The petition alleges that defendant Joshua Burr is indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $1,198, and to recover the sum an action by attachment has been commenced; that while so indebted to plaintiff, the defendant, quoting the language of the petition, “in contemplation of insolvency and being then insolvent, made, executed and delivered in writing a general assignment of his property, for the benefit of his creditors, contained in three instruments executed by him;” that the first of these instruments, referred to in the petition as exhibit A, is a chattel mortgage upon all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  2. Lampson v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Cole v. DealhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. Cowles & Co. v. RickettsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. P. C. Hanford Oil Co. v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Campbell v. Colorado Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. South Branch Lumber Co. v. OttSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API