Murphy v. Nilsen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Petitioners appeal from an administrative decision of the Labor Commissioner finding that petitioners have violated ORS 658.195(4) which requires employment agencies to designate themselves as “agencies” when advertising. Petitioners were required to pay a $150 civil penalty. The material question at issue is whether entities, such as the petitioners, are subject to the employment agency laws of Oregon as comprehensively amended in Oregon Laws 1973, ch 678. ORS 658.005 to 658.245. The petitioners concededly constitute an employer-fee-paid personnel referral service, i.e., petitioners are…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Blyth & Co., Inc. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- MacVeagh v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Banif Corporation v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Wingfield v. National Biscuit CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Pratum Co-Op Warehouse v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1975
- Huntington v. Coffee Associates Food Enterprises-CafeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. Alder Creek Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- California Table Grape Commission v. Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.