State v. Young
Oregon Supreme Court
From Lake: Henry L. Benson, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. On May 11, 1914, tbe defendant, James Young, was indicted by tbe grand jury of Lake County for tbe violation of tbe provisions of Chapter 102, General Laws of Oregon 1913, by employing one William Harvey for more than 10 hours in one day — to wit, for 11 hours. The cause was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury.
Read the full summary
From Lake: Henry L. Benson, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Bean. On May 11, 1914, tbe defendant, James Young, was indicted by tbe grand jury of Lake County for tbe violation of tbe provisions of Chapter 102, General Laws of Oregon 1913, by employing one William Harvey for more than 10 hours in one day — to wit, for 11 hours. The cause was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury. Based upon a stipulation, the court made, in substance, the following findings of fact: That the above-named defendant, James Young, for more than a year last past has been, and now is,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
1-5. Section 2, Chapter 102, Laws of 1913, page 169, is as follows:
“No person shall he employed in any mill, factory or manufacturing establishment in this state more than *402ten hours in any one day, except watchmen and employees when engaged in making necessary repairs, or in case of emergency, where life or property is in imminent danger; provided, however, employees may work overtime not to exceed three hours in any one day, conditioned that payment be made for said overtime at the rate of time and one half the regular wage.”
The question for determination is whether or not the defendant is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Nicoll v. . the New-York and Erie Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Minis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Julius v. DruckreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Johnson v. School District of WakefieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Olson v. HeisenOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Turney v. J. H. Tillman Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.