Legal Opinion

Banif Corporation v. Black

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

■ ■ This is an appeal in a declaratory judgment proceeding in which the plaintiffs songht to have certain alleged “orders” of the Real Estate Commissioner declared invalid. The alleged “orders” were in the form of three letters. Two were to “All Escrow Agencies,” informing them that the Real Estate Commissioner had determined that ORS 696.240 ① requires that a broker may not use the services of an escrow agency owned by the broker or one in which he had a sufficient interest to permit him to exercise control. •The third alleged “order” was a letter to the legal counsel for the Oregon Escrow…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State Highway Commission v. RawsonOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Tyler v. CateOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Haas v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. LeRescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. McDonald v. Title Ins. Co. of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Murphy v. NilsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Remodeling Consultants, Inc. v. Builders BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. The Mann Home v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API