Blyth & Co., Inc. v. City of Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The question for decision on this appeal is whether Marshall N. Dana, a recent appointee to the Commission of Public Docks of the City of Portland, is disqualified to hold that office because he is not a resident of the City of Portland.
The question was submitted to the Circuit Court without action or suit pursuant to the provisions of OBS 27.030. The court was of the opinion that under the charter of the City no one but a resident of the City is qualified to serve as a dock commissioner, and entered a decree holding Mr. Dana disqualified. The City and the Dock Commission have appealed.
Blyth…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Thompson v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
3Cited by15 opinions
- McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Thom v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Christian v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Murphy v. NilsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.