Legal Opinion

Blyth & Co., Inc. v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The question for decision on this appeal is whether Marshall N. Dana, a recent appointee to the Commission of Public Docks of the City of Portland, is disqualified to hold that office because he is not a resident of the City of Portland.

The question was submitted to the Circuit Court without action or suit pursuant to the provisions of OBS 27.030. The court was of the opinion that under the charter of the City no one but a resident of the City is qualified to serve as a dock commissioner, and entered a decree holding Mr. Dana disqualified. The City and the Dock Commission have appealed.

Blyth…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Thompson v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Thom v. BaileyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Christian v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Migis v. Autozone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Murphy v. NilsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API