Legal Opinion
Huntington v. Coffee Associates Food Enterprises-Cafe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 10, 1979No. 78-1927, CA 13338PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*597BUTTLER, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages sustained as a result of a temporary restraining order which had been obtained by Coffee Associates in a prior proceeding, and which, in this proceeding, the trial court found as a matter of law to have been wrongful for want of statutory authority. We affirm.
In the prior lawsuit Coffee Associates sought money damages against Huntington, its franchisee, for goods sold and delivered and for money due on checks which had not been paid upon presentment. When it filed its complaint Coffee Associates filed a motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Cox v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clausen v. CarstensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Rocky B. Fisheries, Inc. v. North Bend Fabrication & MacHine, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GillisOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Lent v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Huntington v. Coffee Associates Food Enterprises-CafeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979