Legal Opinion

McAulay v. Tahoe Ice Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1906No. Civ. No. 221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, and from a conditional order that judgment be entered for respondent. J. W. Hughes, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action for personal services as agent of defendant. The cause was tried before a jury and, after deliberation, the jury returned into court and, being asked if they had agreed upon a verdict, answered they had. Before the amendment or recording thereof, the judge of the court ordered the plaintiff to pay the jury fees of $92, whereupon “counsel for plaintiff stated that plaintiff was unable to pay said jury fee.”

The court then “ordered that plaintiff be granted ten days within which to pay the jury fee, and, if not paid during that time, the court would enter a judgment in favor of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. State ex rel. KneightonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  2. Zane v. De OnativiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. A. M. Bergevin & A. M. Bergevin & Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Mathis v. Superior Court of City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  5. Hanson v. District Court of Third Judicial District in & for Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API