Legal Opinion

Zane v. De Onativia

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1902No. S.F. No. 2804PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeals of defendants and appellants from the judgment and from the order denying a new trial, upon the ground of the insufficiency of the undertakings given to support such appeals. In the trial court judgment passed for plaintiff and against the defendant Lillie for the sum of $3,689.53, with interest at seven per cent from the twenty-second day of December, 1900. Both defendants appealed from this judgment and gave notice of their appeal. The undertaking given recited as follows: “Whereas, the defendant in the above entitled action has appealed…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Title Ins. & Tr. Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Cohen v. ConnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. A. M. Bergevin & A. M. Bergevin & Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. El Dora Oil Co. v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Highland Securities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API