A. M. Bergevin & A. M. Bergevin & Co. v. Wood
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of review to the Superior Court of Amador County. Pred V. Wood, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This is an application for a writ of review occasioned by the dismissal of the appeal of the said A. M. Bergevin & Company from a certain judgment of the justice court of Township No. One in said Amador county. The order of dismissal was based upon the ground of the insufficiency of the bond on appeal.
It is not claimed that the proceedings of the superior court up to the time of said dismissal were in any respect irregular, but the contention is that the court, in holding that the bond was insufficient, exceeded its jurisdiction, or, in other words, did not “regularly pursue” its authority…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Home & Loan Associates v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McConky v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Zane v. De OnativiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Golden Gate Tile Co. v. Superior Court, in & for City of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Petersen v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- First National Bank of Marysville v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Covington v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. Washoe CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1935
- Mathis v. Superior Court of City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.