Pacific Paving Co. v. Verso
California Court of Appeal
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Respondents have made a motion to dismiss .the appeal in this ease upon the ground that the appeal bond filed upon taking the appeal is so defective as not to support the appeal.
Two defects in the bond are pointed out by respondents, one of which they concede is not fatal, and may be corrected by the filing in this court of a new bond under section 954 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Before the hearing of this motion a new bond was filed and approved, which is sufficient in form and substance to support the appeal, provided the other defect in the original bond is not fatal to the appeal.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Home & Loan Associates v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Corcoran v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gerrior v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924