Legal Opinion

Wadleigh v. Phelps

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1905No. Sac. No. 1316PublishedCited by 7 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County, from six orders made before judgment, and from three orders made after judgment. F. T. Nilón, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss eleven separate appeals, or attempted appeals, from the judgment, verdict, and various orders entered in the cause. The suit is in equity to redeem lands mortgaged by deed of conveyance in form absolute. The decree rendered June 29th and entered June 30, 1903, was in favor of the plaintiffs, directing a re-conveyance of the lands upon payment or tender of about eleven thousand dollars found to be due the defendant, less plaintiffs ’ costs of suit.

The defendant moved for a new trial, and pending proceedings upon that motion, on July 27, 1903, served and filed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Williams v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gassert v. StrongMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McAulay v. Tahoe Ice Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. Theisen v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API