Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Superior Court of City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 27, 1920No. Civ. No. 3749PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandamus to require dismissal of a justice’s court appeal. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is a petition in mandamus to require respondents to dismiss an appeal from a judgment rendered by the justice’s court. On the twenty-first day of June, 1920, petitioner herein, as plaintiff, recovered a judgment against Belle Dennett and John C. Oreutt in the justice’s court in the city and county of San Francisco on an assigned claim for taxi hire in the sum of $187.75. On the twenty-fifth day of the same month counsel for defendants filed in the justice’s court a notice of appeal on behalf of both defendants. On the 29th of June there was filed what purported- to be an undertaking on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Title Ins. & Tr. Co. v. California Dev. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Niles v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Perkins v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Zane v. De OnativiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Crowley Launch & Tugboat Co. v. Suprior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Obradovich v. Walker Bros. BankersUtah Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API