Quaid v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
1 1 Robert and Sue Quaid ask this court to reverse the district court's summary judgment ruling that the Loren Cook Company Health Care Benefit Plan (the "Loren Cook plan") was not liable for covering the medical expenses of their newly adopted son, Skylar Quaid, because Skylar was also covered under his birth parents' HMO policy provided by Aetna U.S. Healthcare (the "Aetna policy"). We find that the Aetna policy's coverage of Skylar effectively ceased when the parental rights of his birth parents were terminated. Consequently, the Loren Cook plan's coordination…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Allen v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Benjamin v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Begaye v. BIG D CONSTRUCTION CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Eldridge v. FarnsworthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Hoggan v. HogganUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Kramer v. State Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.