Hoggan v. Hoggan
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
T1 Shortly before she passed away, Leona Hoggan ("Leona") amended a trust that she had created some fifteen years earlier. The amendment provided that, upon Leona's death, her son John Hoggan (a.k.a. "Jack") would be forgiven a loan Leona made to him, rather than receiving a one-third interest in the trust property. Jack asserts that the language of the trust document did not authorize Leona to effect such an amendment. We disagree. Under our previous interpretations of very similar trust language in Banks v. Means, 2002 UT 65, 52 P.3d 1190, and Flake v. Flake (In…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Kline Ex Rel. Kline v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Banks v. MeansUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Quaid v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Warne v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. C.D.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Rhinehart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.