Legal Opinion

Hoggan v. Hoggan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 2007No. 20051104PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Shortly before she passed away, Leona Hoggan ("Leona") amended a trust that she had created some fifteen years earlier. The amendment provided that, upon Leona's death, her son John Hoggan (a.k.a. "Jack") would be forgiven a loan Leona made to him, rather than receiving a one-third interest in the trust property. Jack asserts that the language of the trust document did not authorize Leona to effect such an amendment. We disagree. Under our previous interpretations of very similar trust language in Banks v. Means, 2002 UT 65, 52 P.3d 1190, and Flake v. Flake (In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kimball v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Estate of FlakeUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kline Ex Rel. Kline v. Utah Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Banks v. MeansUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Quaid v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. Warne v. WarneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. C.D.L.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  5. Rhinehart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API