Benjamin v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Justice:
¶ 1 Defendant Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”) seeks interlocutory review of the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment in favor of its insured, plaintiff Arthur Benjamin. Arnica challenges the district court’s determination that ambiguity in Arnica’s insurance policies triggered coverage for various claims arising from alleged sexual assaults committed by Benjamin. We conclude that the unambiguous plain language of the policies provides for coverage of the claims in question. Therefore, although we disagree with its reasoning, we affirm the result…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Mt. Airy Insurance v. GreenbaumCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SandtUtah Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Evanston Insurance Co. v. ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Banner Bank v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Equine Assisted Growth & Learning Ass'n v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.