Begaye v. BIG D CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Associate Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Marlene Begaye appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Big D Construction Company (“Big D”). We conclude that Big D does not fall within the purview of the retained control doctrine because it did not exercise sufficient control over the method and manner of the injury-causing aspect of the work that caused Michael Begaye’s death. Accordingly, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 In 2003, Big D was hired as the general contractor on a large construction project (the “project”) at the University of Utah. In addition to managing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Martens v. MCL Construction Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Thompson v. JessUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- Dayton v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Magana v. Dave Roth ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Newman v. White Water WhirlpoolUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Gonzalez v. Russell Sorensen ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Linebaugh v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Young v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.