Legal Opinion
Kramer v. State Retirement Board
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided October 2, 2008No. 20070762-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
[1 Kelly and Rose Kramer (the Kramers) appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Utah State Retirement Board, Public Employees' Health Program (PEHP). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
12 Mr. Kramer is a Utah Highway Patrol officer. On February 19, 1996, he signed a Utah Public Employees Health/Dental Enrollment Form (the Enrollment Form). The third section on the Enrollment Form stated, "I represent that all information is true and correct. By signing below I hereby ... agree to the terms and conditions in the Utah Retirement Systemsg/PEHP Master Policy [ (the Master Policy)…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Robinson v. City of Wichita Employees' Retirement Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Kuhn v. Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. SmaistralaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- Robinson v. WICHITA EMPLOYEES'RET. BD.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010