Legal Opinion

Alf v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. 900582PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This case arises out of a breach of contract claim filed by Phillip and Katherine Alf against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) for failing to hon- or the all-risk homeowners insurance policy (the “Policy”) the Alfs purchased from State Farm. The Alfs appeal from an order granting State Farm’s summary judgment motion and thereby denying coverage under the Policy. We affirm.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. On March 8, 1988, the Alfs purchased an all-risk homeowner’s insurance policy on their home and premises in Draper, Utah. On or about February…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Garvey v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Steven M. Martin Peggy D. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Saleh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 2006

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API