Legal Opinion
Carlson v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1935No. Civ. 1161PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDEN, J., pro tem.
Joseph W. Murphy was engaged in the business of buying and selling mortgages in San Diego under the fictitious name of Joseph W. Murphy Mortgage Company. On June 14, 1929, he made, executed and delivered to plaintiffs a written guaranty for the payment of principal and interest on a $4,000 note which he caused to be assigned to plaintiffs. After Murphy’s death, on September 18, 192'9, the business was carried on for a time by his wife, the defendant Bertha M. Murphy, and thereafter was continued by defendant Walden. Defendant Lytle was employed as salesman for the business…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Harding v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Cheney v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Griswold v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Ayers v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Huston v. Ohio & Colorado Smelting & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Conrad v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. MusacchioDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Shapiro v. SutherlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.