Legal Opinion

Huston v. Ohio & Colorado Smelting & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 2, 1917No. 8806PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

Charles C. Huston, plaintiff below, sought to recover of the defendant company- money which had been paid by one Martha D. Huston, during her lifetime, to the defendant for shares of its capital stock. A demurrer to the amended complaint was sustained by the trial court, and this is the principal alleged error to be considered.

The amended complaint alleged, among other things, in substance the following: That Martha D. Huston purchased the shares from defendant, at times prior to June 13, 1903, and was induced to purchase same by means of certain misrepresentations of the defendant and its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. SchifferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Wheeler v. DunnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  3. Fox v. HirschfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. Anthony v. SlaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. Steele v. BrazierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Saine v. A.I.A., Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1984
  3. WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
  4. Schwartz v. DurhamArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Global Financial Services, Inc. v. DuttenhefnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API