Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Morrison

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1921No. Civ. No. 3312PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

This is an action on a promissory note for $1,000, dated May 29, 1919, and executed by defendants to one Akers as payment for certain hogs bought by defendants from Akers. The latter, before the maturity of the note, indorsed and delivered it to plaintiff, who, claiming to be an innocent indorsee in due course of business, for value and without notice of any infirmity in the instrument, sues defendants as the makers. The case was tried before a jury, the verdict was in favor of defendants, and from a judgment that he take nothing by the action plaintiff appeals.

In their answer, defendants set…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Jordan & Sons v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. A. A. Baxter Corp. v. Colt Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Kallmeyer v. PooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API