Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Sutherland
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1998No. B103078PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
In this case, we review a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendants David P. and Mary Sutherland (the Sutherlands) and Prudential Resources Management, formerly known as Prudential Relocation Management (Prudential; collectively, the defendants). Plaintiff, Barry D. Shapiro, seeks to overturn the summary rejection of his complaint for rescission and damages arising out of a fraudulent misrepresentation and material nondisclosure which allegedly occurred in connection with his purchase of a residential property from the defendants. The trial court granted the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Lovejoy v. AT&T CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Assilzadeh v. California Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Madden v. Cowen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Anderson v. METALCLAD INSULATION CORP.California Court of Appeal · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.