Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1932No. 29,024PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.

Plaintiff brought suit to recover under a life and disability policy issued by the defendant. The plaintiff seeks recovery under the disability provisions of the policy, which read as follows:

“Total and Permanent Disability Benefits.
“Upon receipt at the Home Office in the Oity of New York, of due proof that any Employee, not working in Mexico, while insured hereunder, and prior to his sixtieth birthday, has become totally and permanently disabled, as the result of bodily injury or disease, so as to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Cato v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API