Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Spencer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, O'. J.,
(after stating the facts). Evidence was introduced by appellant tending to show that appellee was not totally disabled and also that his disability was not permanent; but, inasmuch as the verdict of the jury must be tested by the evidence in the light most favorable to appellee, we need not abstract the testimony for appellant. Under our settled rules of practice, if there is any evidence of a substantive character to support a verdict, it cannot be disturbed upon appeal.
Contracts of insurance should receive a reasonable construction so as to effectuate the purposes for which…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PhiferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Mutual Life Insurance v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MaloneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. ChambersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Travelers' Protective Assoc. of America v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. RummellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.