People v. Duncan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County and from an order refusing a new trial. Geo. D. Murray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Defendant was accused by information ‘ ‘ of the crime of permitting his wife to remain in a house of prostitution, committed as follows: That the said George A. Duncan, on November 12, 1911, at and in the county of Humboldt and state of California, and from thence continuously until on or about the 12th day of April, 1912, did willfully, unlawfully, knowingly and feloniously, allow and permit one Ella Duncan, who was then and there . . . the wife of him the said George A. Duncan, to remain in a house of prostitution, known as No. 48 Fourth Street, Eureka, . . . contrary,” etc. The jury found…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lewis v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. OatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. ConnessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. ChutnacutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bradford v. SargentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Brodsky v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Anderson v. WagnonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.