Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Sargent
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1933No. Docket No. 688PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Respondent recovered judgment against appellant and defendants for damages suffered in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on G- Street in the city of San Bernardino, between 5 and 6 o’clock on the afternoon of Saturday, June 13, 1931. This appeal is taken by A. M. Sargent alone.
A. M. Sargent was the owner of a Ford coupe. Andy Sargent was his minor son of the age of about sixteen years, and Lee Swartz was a minor of the age of about nineteen years at the time of the accident. A. M. Sargent and his son Andy lived in the city of Colton, and Lee Swartz in the city of San Bernardino.
At about…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Chaika v. VandenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Henrietta v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Carroll v. BeaversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.