Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Dunne

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1901No. S.F. No. 2833PublishedCited by 42 opinions

PETITION for writ of mandamus to a Judge of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. B. Bosley, John S. Drum, J. R. Pringle, Stafford & Stafford, and D. C. Deasy, for Petitioner.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an original' petition here for a writ of mandamus. An alternative writ was issued, and upon answer of respondent and argument of counsel the cause was submitted. Whether or not the writ should be made absolute depends upon the constitutionality of a certain act of the legislature approved March 8,1901. If the act is constitutional, then the writ should be denied; if not, then it should issue. Several other cases involving the same questions have been submitted, and the decision in this case will be determinative of the others.

Petitioner contends that the act in question is void…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Ex parte LiddellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People Ex Rel. McConvill v. HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. People v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. People Ex Rel. Lee v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In Re HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Plyam v. Precision Development, LLC (In Re Plyam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API