Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. California State Board of Pharmacy

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1959No. Civ. 23634PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

The State Board of Pharmacy suspended petitioner’s license to practice as a licentiate in pharmacy for 30 days, stayed execution of the order, and placed him on probation for one year on specified conditions. The appeal is from a judgment denying a writ of mandate to compel the board to annul its order.

The accusation against petitioner charged a violation of section 4385 of the Business and Professions Code 1 which provides that any person who permits the compounding of prescriptions or the selling of drugs in his pharmacy except by a registered pharmacist is guilty of a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. In Re MarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Murrill v. State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Mantzoros v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PikeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Leslie Salt Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. People v. CoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Beamon v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API