Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Wagnon
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1952No. Civ. 8020PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on June 21, 1944, as a result of the alleged negligent operation of an automobile operated by defendant Wagnon. It was alleged that the automobile was under the control of defendant Marshall, and owned by defendant Clark; and that Marshall was operating the automobile “with the knowledge, consent, permission and authority of defendant Clark.”
The cause was tried by the court, sitting without a jury, and the court found (1) that “the defendant Harry Spencer Wagnon was driving said automobile…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Buelke v. LevenstadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Burgess v. CahillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
- Glens Falls Ins. Co. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Fremont Compensation Insurance v. HartnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Dorman v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Consolidated FreightwaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.