Legal Opinion
Tedesco v. Department of Transportation
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 22, 1994No. 12656PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The plaintiff, Ruth Tedesco, appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant department of transportation’s motion to dismiss a personal injury suit brought pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-144.1 The plaintiff claims2 that the trial court improperly found as a matter of law that the plaintiff did not provide the defendant with sufficient notice as required by General Statutes § 13a-144.3
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. On April 13,1990, the plaintiff allegedly suffered injuries as a result of a fall due to a hole in the sidewalk on a bridge in downtown…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Warkentin v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schaap v. City of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin v. Town of PlainvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- White v. EdmondsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Tyson v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Serrano v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Graham v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.