Legal Opinion

Schaap v. City of Meriden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 10, 1952PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The plaintiff sued the city of Meriden and the state highway commissioner for damages for personal injuries claimed to have resulted from a fall on a defective state highway and had a judgment against the commissioner. A principal ground of the latter’s appeal is that the written notice, required by statute, is fatally defective.

The finding, in so far as it is relevant to this issue, may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff lived in Meriden on the south side of West Main Street, a state highway. The right of way was sixty-six feet wide. The wrought portion consisted of concrete pavement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. Sizer v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  3. Shaw v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1878
  4. Judd v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Warkentin v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Filippi v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API