Legal Opinion

Graham v. Commissioner of Transportation

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 2016No. AC37975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The plaintiff, Barry Graham, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the Commissioner of Transportation, in this action to recover damages under the state defective highway statute, General Statutes § 13a-144. 1 The plaintiff commenced this action on July 9, 2012, to recover for injuries he claims to have suffered on December 12, 2011, in a motor vehicle accident allegedly caused by the sliding of the vehicle that he was then operating on untreated black ice in the northbound lanes of Interstate 95 as it crosses the Thames River between New…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  2. Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. Graham v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Bin Ding v. LazaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API