Tyson v. Sullivan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant James F. Sullivan,1 the commissioner of transportation, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss count one of the plaintiffs complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.2 The defendant claims that the court improperly concluded that sovereign immunity did not deny the court subject matter jurisdiction because (1) the plaintiffs action fell within the scope of the state highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a-144,3 and (2) the *599plaintiffs statutorily required notice of claim was not patently defective in its description of his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- Serrano v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- DeConti v. McGloneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- McIntosh v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Graham v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- McIntosh v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.