Legal Opinion

Warkentin v. Burns

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 21, 1992No. 14247PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

This is a negligence action seeking damages for injuries and death sustained as the result of an automobile accident allegedly caused by a defective, i.e., icy, highway. The dispositive issue is whether the plaintiff complied with the notice provisions of General Statutes § 13a-144.1 We conclude that the plaintiff failed to provide timely and sufficient notice to the commissioner of transportation of her claim and thus was barred from bringing this action. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment for the named defendant that was rendered on different grounds.2

The relevant facts are not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  2. Borden Co. v. BorellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. State v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Bresnan v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Police Department v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API