Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Casper v. Moore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1893No. 6169PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Controversy involving the validity of the legislative appropriation of 1893 for impeachment proceedings, submitted to the supreme court under the provisions of section 567 of the Civil Code.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Commission.

This case was submitted under section 567 of the Code of Civil Procedure, upon an agreed statement of facts substantially as follows:

“ That in the general appropriation bill known as house roll No. 207 of the twenty-third session of the legislature of the state of Nebraska, after the said bill had been sent to the senate and was there amended and returned to the house of representatives, the house of representatives then further amended the bill by including an item therein of $25,000 for the purpose of paying the expenses of impeachment proceedings; that said bill then went…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Huff v. McLellandNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. State ex rel. Poole v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State ex rel. Marlay v. LiedtkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Ames v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1894
  3. Allen v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Lafferty v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API