Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Logan County; A. II. Huston, Judge. Action by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Ee Bailway Company against the State. Judgment for defendant, and, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
Eor convenience, plaintiff in error will be referred to as “the railway company” and defendant in error as “the state.”
This cause arose in the district court of Logan county upon a submitted controversy in lieu of an action. The railway company seeks to prevent the state from collecting a tax levied against its property for common-school purposes under a provision of an act of the Legislature approved March 10, 1909 (Sess. Laws 1909, p. 600). Section 2, article 7 of that act provides in part as follows:
“There is hereby levied annually an ad valorem tax upon all property in this state which…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Koehler & Lange v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- In Re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.