Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Foster v. Naftalin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1956No. 36,749PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This proceeding originally was commenced as an action for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the constitutionality of L. 1955, c. 857, and an injunction restraining defendants from acting thereunder. While a motion for a temporary injunction was pending, the parties, by stipulation, converted the action into a proceeding in quo warranto for the purpose of speedily testing the right of defendants Arthur Naftalin, Arthur Hansen, and Morris Hursh to hold and exercise respectively the offices of secretary of the State Executive Council, secretary of the State…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Moog v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Berry v. Baltimore & Drum Point RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  5. People ex rel. Sellers v. BradyIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Walker v. DoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Chicago Title Insurance Co. v. HuffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  4. State v. HammSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API