State ex rel. Poole v. Robinson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Quo warranto to test the right of respondent to exercise the office of register of deeds in Cass county.
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
The leading and controlling question in this case is identical with that in The State ex rel. Huff v. McLelland, 18 Neb., 236.
The case has been ably presented by counsel; the whole ground having been closely and thoroughly examined, and cases have been cited which seem to sustain the theory contended for by relator. But after a somewhat careful examination of the question, guided by the light of the constitution and law of this state, we are still of the opinion that the decision in the prior case was correct. . The journals of the legislature are made competent evidence by section 418 of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Huff v. McLellandNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ames v. Union Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1894
- Rash v. AllenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1910
- State ex rel. Casper v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- State ex rel. Singleton v. Van DuynNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- State ex rel. McClay v. MickeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.