Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Marlay v. Liedtke

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Original application for mandamus to compel the respondent to draw his warrant on the state treasurer for the sum of $75, balance of salary alleged to be due the relator as deputy commissioner of public lands and buildings for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 1879.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Tbe act of tbe legislature, entitled “ An act to provide for tbe payment of tbe salaries of tbe officers of tbe state government, penitentiary, hospital for insane, institutes for tbe blind and deaf and dumb, for tbe years 1879 and 1880,” approved Eeb. 27,1879 [Laws, 1879, p. 427], fixes the salary of tbe relator at $1200 per annum, and appropriates $2400 for tbe purpose of paying tbe same for tbe years 1879 and 18.80. Such' are tbe provisions of tbe law as published, and as it appears in tbe .enrolled act on- file in tbe office of tbe secretary of state.

It would not avail tbe relator in this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brassey v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State ex rel. Casper v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API