Legal Opinion

Allred v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 11PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs alleged no procedural irregularity in the adoption of the Ordinance. They attack it, inter alia, on the ground it exceeds and conflicts with the authority conferred by the enabling legislation.

A duly adopted rezoning ordinance is presumed to be valid. Controversies in respect of facts pertinent to its validity present questions of fact for determination by the superior court •judge. Zopfi v. City of Wilmington, 273 N.C. 430, 438, 160 S.E. 2d 325, 333. Here, the evidence discloses no conflicts as to essential facts.

The original zoning power of the State…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. In Re Appeal of O'NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Collard v. Incorporated Village of Flower HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Norco Construction, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1982

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API