Legal Opinion

Bicycle Transit Authority, Inc. v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1985No. 134A85PublishedCited by 165 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The primary issues presented for review are (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that summary judgment was inappropriate for any party because there was a material question of fact as to whether the covenant not to compete had been breached, and (2) if summary judgment was appropriate given the record before the trial judge, whether it was properly entered in favor of one or more defendants. For reasons set forth below, we hold that whether the covenant not to compete was breached is a question of law and therefore the Court of Appeals erroneously remanded the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by165 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Murray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Ellis v. Northern Star Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Governor's Club, Inc. v. Governors Club Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Arnesen v. Rivers Edge Golf Club and Plantation, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015

160 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API