Loanvest I, LLC v. Utrecht
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
Plaintiff Loanvest I, LLC (Loanvest), appeals from the dismissal of its cause of action against its former attorneys, Paul F. Utrecht and Utrecht & Lenvin, LLP (collectively Utrecht), after the court granted Utrecht’s special motion to strike under the “anti-SLAPP” 1 statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16). 2 Utrecht is being sued for malpractice by Loanvest, now under the control of James Madow, for allegedly disregarding the interests of Loanvest in order to protect the interests of the person who formerly controlled Loanvest in an action that Madow himself brought against…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
- Freeman v. SchackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gaynor v. Bulen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Yeager v. Holt, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sprengel v. ZbylutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Alan C. Cartwright v. Thomason Hendrix, P.C.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.