Legal Opinion

Langston v. Nash

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1941No. 13742PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. The superior court is “without jurisdiction to render a judgment for permanent alimony . . before the appearance term; . . such jurisdiction [can] not be conferred by consent of the parties;” and such a judgment, “being void for lack of jurisdiction, [can] not be the basis of contempt proceedings against the defendant for failure to pay permanent alimony.” Seigler v. Seigler, 181 Ga. 310 (181 S. E. 822). Until the act of 1935 (Ga. L. 1935, p. 481; Ann. Code, §§ 30-131, 30-132), which authorized all judgments in divorce cases to be taken “at the first or appearance term,”…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dix v. DixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Smith v. FerrarioSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Cutts v. ScandrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Luther v. ClaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. RedwineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Goodloe v. GoodloeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Wiles v. WilesOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API