Legal Opinion

Kubby v. Hammond

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1948No. 4980PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment perpetually enjoining and restraining the defendant, David Kubby (appellant), from constructing or operating an automobile wrecking plant on certain premises owned by him at 1333 East Washington Street in Phoenix, Arizona.

The essential facts are these: Defendant for some 2% years prior to this litigation had been operating an automobile wrecking plant, as well as dealing in used cars, under a state license, at his established place of business, 1330 East Washington Street. In an expansion program, defendant acquired three lots (1333 East…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Haller Baking Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  4. North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Morin v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Nesbit v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Robinson v. LintzArizona Supreme Court · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API