Legal Opinion
Maso v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 2004No. 23,218PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Appellant Raphael Maso (Driver) raises due process concerns about the notice that he received of his right to request a hearing prior to the revocation of his driver’s license under the Implied Consent Act (the Act). NMSA 1978, §§ 66-8-105 to -112 (1978, as amended through 2003). Driver concedes that he received notice and also that his subsequent request for a hearing was untimely. He asserts, however, that he did not understand the notice because it was in English and he understands only Spanish. He therefore contends that the notice did not comport with due process…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Natalia Nazarova v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Schuster v. New Mexico Dep't. of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- Maso v. STATE OF NEW MEXICO TAXATIONNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Los Chavez Cmty. Assn. v. Valencia Cnty.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Los Chavez Community v. Valencia CountyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.